Engineering Biology for Climate & Sustainability
Food & Agriculture Goal:

Enable a food and agriculture sector resilient to a changing climate.

Current State-of-the-Art

One of the most significant effects of climate change on human health and well-being is the impact on food production and agricultural practices, and engineering biology has many opportunities to impact and improve resilience and sustainability throughout the entire food and agriculture sector. Climate change is impacting where we grow our food, how crops and livestock adapt to environmental conditions, and the quality of the food when it gets to our plates. Current practices in food and agriculture also contribute to climate stressors, including the use of fertilizers and pesticides, production of methane, and energy consumption and pollution for food processing, transportation, and storage.

Engineering biology can contribute to advanced “smart agriculture” tools to complement agricultural production by enabling sustainable biosensors and reporters to measure critical changes in soil and crop health in real time. This can help to ensure that farmers and growers can identify and resolve stresses or combat disease before it affects an entire crop. Biosensors and reporters could also be applied to monitoring livestock health.

Soil health is particularly important, not only for mitigating the effects of climate change but also to support sustainable growing practices. Soil microbiome engineering could enhance depleted soils by reconstituting nutrients (e.g., nitrogen) needed for plant growth, increase bioavailability of nitrogen and phosphorus in the root rhizosphere, replenish nutrients that were removed during the previous growing season, and concentrate minerals and other micronutrients to improve crop nutrient content. Engineered soil microbiomes have been shown to improve plant health by mitigating soil pathogens.1Schlatter, D., Kinkel, L., Thomashow, L., Weller, D., & Paulitz, T. (2017). Disease Suppressive Soils: New Insights from the Soil Microbiome. Phytopathology, 107(11), 1284–1297. View Publication. Further research could enable engineered soil microbiomes that help plants survive during stress-inducing environmental conditions (including heat, high-salt content, drought, flood, pollution, and disease).

Engineering biology could build crop resistance to biotic and abiotic stresses (e.g., disease, drought, temperature, nitrogen limitation). For example, microbiomes could be engineered to increase drought tolerance in plants by creating biofilms on leaves to decrease transpiration without affecting carbon dioxide uptake and to increase water capture from atmospheric moisture. Alternatively, crops could be engineered for more robust photosynthesis with less perturbation when conditions rapidly change, such as by modifying non-photochemical quenching to increase yield.2Souza, A., Burgess, S., Doran, L., Hansen, J., Manukyan, L., Maryn, N., Gotarkar, D., Leonelli, L., Niyogi, K., Long, S. (2022). Soybean photosynthesis and crop yield are improved by accelerating recovery from photoprotection. View Publication. There is also a growing need to develop flood-resistant crops, especially for communities impacted by sea level rise and increased flooding due to climate change.3Sasidharan, R., Voesenek, L. A. C. J., & Perata, P. (2021). Plant performance and food security in a wetter world. New Phytologist, 229(1), 5–7. View Publication. Plant microbiomes could also help to reduce pathogen disease pressure, such as by being engineered to secrete pathogen-specific cell-wall degrading enzymes.

In addition to threatening global or regional food yields, more intense and frequent extreme weather events caused by climate change disrupt food transportation and supplies, increasing the likelihood of food spoiling. There are several engineering biology approaches to mitigate food spoilage at different stages of the supply chain. Biobased systems could be developed to sense and report early biomarkers of food spoilage or the presence of pathogens or spoilage metabolites. Food-safe, novel bioprotectants applied to produce could lengthen shelf life; for example, ingestible biopolymer coatings could be developed to counteract spoilage-causing microbes or inhibit early stage biofilm formation.4Marelli, B. (2022). Biomaterials for boosting food security. Science, 376(6589), 146–147. View Publication. Biopolymer coatings may also reduce energy consumption by reducing reliance on refrigeration to keep produce fresh. Novel biomaterials could be designed to express preservatives (such as benzoate) on-demand to respond to specific environmental signals (e.g., time, temperature, pH, microbial activity). Engineered biomaterials could detect and control the ripening of produce. For example, cell-free or cell-based biosensors could be developed to detect molecules associated with over-ripening/spoilage in food storage facilities (e.g., ethylene detecting sensors in apple warehouses). To control ripening, engineered biological systems could selectively release molecules that modulate ripening (e.g., ethylene, methyl salicylate). For example, microbes could be engineered to dynamically produce and break down ethylene in response to local concentrations to accelerate ripening post-storage, but slow spoilage. And advances in food packaging could prolong shelf life of produce and reduce urban pollution and the associated GHG emissions.

Breakthrough Capabilities & Milestones

Sense and report soil and crop health and response to climate stress.

Engineer soils and crops resilient to a changing climate.

Includes resiliency to biotic (e.g., pathogens, invasive species) and abiotic (e.g., excessive heat, flood, drought, high salinity) stressors that contribute to stressful environmental conditions and nutrient scarcity.

*Ngou, B. P. M., Ding, P., & Jones, J. D. G. (2022). Thirty years of resistance: Zig-zag through the plant immune system. The Plant Cell, 34(5), 1447–1478. https://doi.org/10.1093/plcell/koac041

Engineer foods and biomaterials to detect, reduce, and prevent spoilage.

Footnotes

  1. Schlatter, D., Kinkel, L., Thomashow, L., Weller, D., & Paulitz, T. (2017). Disease Suppressive Soils: New Insights from the Soil Microbiome. Phytopathology, 107(11), 1284–1297. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-03-17-0111-RVW
  2. Souza, A., Burgess, S., Doran, L., Hansen, J., Manukyan, L., Maryn, N., Gotarkar, D., Leonelli, L., Niyogi, K., Long, S. (2022). Soybean photosynthesis and crop yield are improved by accelerating recovery from photoprotection. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adc9831
  3. Sasidharan, R., Voesenek, L. A. C. J., & Perata, P. (2021). Plant performance and food security in a wetter world. New Phytologist, 229(1), 5–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.17067
  4. Marelli, B. (2022). Biomaterials for boosting food security. Science, 376(6589), 146–147. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abo4233
  5. Del Valle, I., Fulk, E. M., Kalvapalle, P., Silberg, J. J., Masiello, C. A., & Stadler, L. B. (2021). Translating New Synthetic Biology Advances for Biosensing Into the Earth and Environmental Sciences. Frontiers in Microbiology, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.618373
  6. Wang, Y., Cheng, X., Shan, Q., Zhang, Y., Liu, J., Gao, C., & Qiu, J.-L. (2014). Simultaneous editing of three homoeoalleles in hexaploid bread wheat confers heritable resistance to powdery mildew. Nature Biotechnology, 32(9), 947–951. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2969
  7. Lv, L., Zhang, W., Sun, L., Zhao, A., Zhang, Y., Wang, L., Liu, Y., Li, Z., Li, H., & Chen, X. (2020). Gene co-expression network analysis to identify critical modules and candidate genes of drought-resistance in wheat. PLOS ONE, 15(8), e0236186. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236186
  8. Ramkumar, T. R., Lenka, S. K., Arya, S. S., & Bansal, K. C. (2020). A Short History and Perspectives on Plant Genetic Transformation. In S. Rustgi & H. Luo (Eds.), Biolistic DNA Delivery in Plants: Methods and Protocols (pp. 39–68). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-0356-7_3
  9. Altpeter, F., Springer, N. M., Bartley, L. E., Blechl, A. E., Brutnell, T. P., Citovsky, V., Conrad, L. J., Gelvin, S. B., Jackson, D. P., Kausch, A. P., Lemaux, P. G., Medford, J. I., Orozco-Cárdenas, M. L., Tricoli, D. M., Van Eck, J., Voytas, D. F., Walbot, V., Wang, K., Zhang, Z. J., & Stewart, C. N., Jr. (2016). Advancing Crop Transformation in the Era of Genome Editing. The Plant Cell, 28(7), 1510–1520. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.16.00196
  10. Sirirungruang, S., Markel, K., & Shih, P. M. (2022). Plant-based engineering for production of high-valued natural products. Natural Product Reports, 39(7), 1492–1509. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2NP00017B
  11. Aregawi, K., Shen, J., Pierroz, G., Sharma, M. K., Dahlberg, J., Owiti, J., & Lemaux, P. G. (2022). Morphogene-assisted transformation of Sorghum bicolor allows more efficient genome editing. Plant Biotechnology Journal, 20(4), 748–760. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.13754
  12. Deynze, A. V., Zamora, P., Delaux, P.-M., Heitmann, C., Jayaraman, D., Rajasekar, S., Graham, D., Maeda, J., Gibson, D., Schwartz, K. D., Berry, A. M., Bhatnagar, S., Jospin, G., Darling, A., Jeannotte, R., Lopez, J., Weimer, B. C., Eisen, J. A., Shapiro, H.-Y., … Bennett, A. B. (2018). Nitrogen fixation in a landrace of maize is supported by a mucilage-associated diazotrophic microbiota. PLOS Biology, 16(8), e2006352. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2006352
  13. Brophy, J. A. N., Magallon, K. J., Duan, L., Zhong, V., Ramachandran, P., Kniazev, K., & Dinneny, J. R. (2022). Synthetic genetic circuits as a means of reprogramming plant roots. Science, 377(6607), 747–751. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abo4326
  14. Hernandez, M. N., & Lindow, S. E. (2019). Pseudomonas syringae Increases Water Availability in Leaf Microenvironments via Production of Hygroscopic Syringafactin. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 85(18), e01014-19. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01014-19
  15. Hutchison, C. A., Chuang, R.-Y., Noskov, V. N., Assad-Garcia, N., Deerinck, T. J., Ellisman, M. H., Gill, J., Kannan, K., Karas, B. J., Ma, L., Pelletier, J. F., Qi, Z.-Q., Richter, R. A., Strychalski, E. A., Sun, L., Suzuki, Y., Tsvetanova, B., Wise, K. S., Smith, H. O., … Venter, J. C. (2016). Design and synthesis of a minimal bacterial genome. Science, 351(6280), aad6253. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aad6253
  16. Hutchison, C. A., Chuang, R.-Y., Noskov, V. N., Assad-Garcia, N., Deerinck, T. J., Ellisman, M. H., Gill, J., Kannan, K., Karas, B. J., Ma, L., Pelletier, J. F., Qi, Z.-Q., Richter, R. A., Strychalski, E. A., Sun, L., Suzuki, Y., Tsvetanova, B., Wise, K. S., Smith, H. O., … Venter, J. C. (2016). Design and synthesis of a minimal bacterial genome. Science, 351(6280), aad6253. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aad6253
Last updated: September 19, 2022 Back