Engineering Biology for Climate & Sustainability
Biosequestration of Greenhouse Gases Goal:

Increase carbon uptake and mitigate climate change by enhancing natural systems through engineered biology.

Current State-of-the-Art

In addition to the active removal of greenhouse gases from the atmosphere, engineering biology can be used to bolster the uptake and storage of carbon in natural ecosystems. Agricultural ecosystems, wetlands and deserts all represent promising terrestrial ecosystems for carbon storage. Plant engineering, such as increasing carbon capture phenotypes through overexpression or engineering rhizosphere communities, could increase soil carbon capacity by modifying crops to store more carbon in their roots. Wetlands already represent major global carbon sinks1Nahlik, A. M., & Fennessy, M. S. (2016). Carbon storage in US wetlands. Nature Communications, 7(1), 13835. View Publication. and a source of increasing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions.2Zhang, Z., Zimmermann, N. E., Stenke, A., Li, X., Hodson, E. L., Zhu, G., Huang, C., & Poulter, B. (2017). Emerging role of wetland methane emissions in driving 21st century climate change. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(36), 9647–9652. View Publication. Pollutant-degrading microbes could be deployed to help wetland plants fight pollution-related wetland degradation and support carbon sequestration. Engineering approaches that can rapidly restore wetlands, increase carbon storage, and reduce methane production (or increased methane utilization) could have a large beneficial climate effect.

Climate change is also contributing significantly to changes in terrestrial ecosystems conditions, particularly in the amount of heat they experience and the amount of water available. Arid ecosystems represent a promising target for soil carbon accumulation given that they account for ~40% of land area, are typically already very low carbon soils, and the limited water already stabilizes soil carbon pools.3Rodríguez-Caballero, E., Castro, A. J., Chamizo, S., Quintas-Soriano, C., Garcia-Llorente, M., Cantón, Y., & Weber, B. (2018). Ecosystem services provided by biocrusts: From ecosystem functions to social values. Journal of Arid Environments, 159, 45–53. View Publication. Engineering microbial communities that colonized these arid soils (biocrusts) provides a very promising approach to store soil carbon. Some large-scale projects in China have already demonstrated the feasibility of artificial inoculation of sands with biocrust cyanobacteria (hundreds of hectares4Zhou, X., Zhao, Y., Belnap, J., Zhang, B., Bu, C., & Zhang, Y. (2020). Practices of biological soil crust rehabilitation in China: Experiences and challenges. Restoration Ecology, 28(S2), S45–S55. View Publication.) for stabilizing soils, building soil carbon, and initiating ecosystem restoration. Given that large, and unfortunately growing, scale of arid ecosystems these approaches could have a massive impact and could potentially turn wastelands back into arable lands to help support Earth’s growing population. Finally, microbial ice nucleation could be leveraged to help maintain snowpack, create more reflective surfaces in alpine and polar environments, and preserve permafrost and prevent carbon release.5Brouillette, M. (2021). How microbes in permafrost could trigger a massive carbon bomb. Nature, 591(7850), 360–362. View Publication.

Engineering biology could also enhance coastal and ocean carbon sequestration. Ocean and coastal environments account for significant amounts of CO2 removal and storage, but are highly susceptible to damage caused by climate change. The processes of carbon cycling and storage in marine environments are less researched, but extremely productive.6National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2019). Negative Emissions Technologies and Reliable Sequestration: A Research Agenda. View Publication., 7Zhang, Y., Zhang, J., Liang, Y., Li, H., Li, G., Chen, X., Zhao, P., Jiang, Z., Zou, D., Liu, X., & Liu, J. (2017b). Carbon sequestration processes and mechanisms in coastal mariculture environments in China. Science China Earth Sciences, 60(12), 2097–2107. View Publication. Phytoplanktons and macroalgae, such as kelp, could be engineered to improve carbon capture in the ocean and mitigate ocean acidification. Similarly, planctomycetota (bacteria that carry out anammox, anaerobic ammonium oxidation, reactions), halophiles, and viruses could also play very important roles in marine carbon sequestration, and potentially be incorporated into microbiomes or otherwise be stably deployed into oceans to increase carbon capture.

Breakthrough Capabilities & Milestones

Enhance soil carbon storage capacity via engineered biology.

Restore disturbed natural biocrusts and increase carbon sequestration in arid lands.

Enhance albedo via engineered microbes.

Enhance ocean and coastal carbon capacity via engineered biology.

Footnotes

  1. Nahlik, A. M., & Fennessy, M. S. (2016). Carbon storage in US wetlands. Nature Communications, 7(1), 13835. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms13835
  2. Zhang, Z., Zimmermann, N. E., Stenke, A., Li, X., Hodson, E. L., Zhu, G., Huang, C., & Poulter, B. (2017). Emerging role of wetland methane emissions in driving 21st century climate change. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(36), 9647–9652. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1618765114
  3. Rodríguez-Caballero, E., Castro, A. J., Chamizo, S., Quintas-Soriano, C., Garcia-Llorente, M., Cantón, Y., & Weber, B. (2018). Ecosystem services provided by biocrusts: From ecosystem functions to social values. Journal of Arid Environments, 159, 45–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2017.09.005
  4. Zhou, X., Zhao, Y., Belnap, J., Zhang, B., Bu, C., & Zhang, Y. (2020). Practices of biological soil crust rehabilitation in China: Experiences and challenges. Restoration Ecology, 28(S2), S45–S55. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.13148
  5. Brouillette, M. (2021). How microbes in permafrost could trigger a massive carbon bomb. Nature, 591(7850), 360–362. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-021-00659-y
  6. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2019). Negative Emissions Technologies and Reliable Sequestration: A Research Agenda. https://doi.org/10.17226/25259
  7. Zhang, Y., Zhang, J., Liang, Y., Li, H., Li, G., Chen, X., Zhao, P., Jiang, Z., Zou, D., Liu, X., & Liu, J. (2017b). Carbon sequestration processes and mechanisms in coastal mariculture environments in China. Science China Earth Sciences, 60(12), 2097–2107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-017-9148-7
  8. Watts-Williams, S. J. (2022). Track and trace: How soil labelling techniques have revealed the secrets of resource transport in the arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis. Mycorrhiza, 32(3), 257–267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00572-022-01080-7
  9. Mahmood, K., Zeisler-Diehl, V. V., Schreiber, L., Bi, Y.-M., Rothstein, S. J., & Ranathunge, K. (2019). Overexpression of ANAC046 Promotes Suberin Biosynthesis in Roots of Arabidopsis thaliana. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 20(24), 6117. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20246117
  10. Baxter, I., Hosmani, P. S., Rus, A., Lahner, B., Borevitz, J. O., Muthukumar, B., Mickelbart, M. V., Schreiber, L., Franke, R. B., & Salt, D. E. (2009). Root Suberin Forms an Extracellular Barrier That Affects Water Relations and Mineral Nutrition in Arabidopsis. PLOS Genetics, 5(5), e1000492. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1000492
  11. Harman-Ware, A. E., Sparks, S., Addison, B., & Kalluri, U. C. (2021). Importance of suberin biopolymer in plant function, contributions to soil organic carbon and in the production of bio-derived energy and materials. Biotechnology for Biofuels, 14(1), 75. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-021-01892-3
  12. Harman-Ware, A. E., Sparks, S., Addison, B., & Kalluri, U. C. (2021). Importance of suberin biopolymer in plant function, contributions to soil organic carbon and in the production of bio-derived energy and materials. Biotechnology for Biofuels, 14(1), 75. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-021-01892-3
  13. von Rein, I., Gessler, A., Premke, K., Keitel, C., Ulrich, A., & Kayler, Z. E. (2016). Forest understory plant and soil microbial response to an experimentally induced drought and heat-pulse event: The importance of maintaining the continuum. Global Change Biology, 22(8), 2861–2874. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13270
  14. Wipf, H. M.-L., Bùi, T.-N., & Coleman-Derr, D. (2021). Distinguishing Between the Impacts of Heat and Drought Stress on the Root Microbiome of Sorghum bicolor. Phytobiomes Journal, 5(2), 166–176. https://doi.org/10.1094/PBIOMES-07-20-0052-R
  15. Douglas, A. E. (2020). The microbial exometabolome: Ecological resource and architect of microbial communities. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 375(1798), 20190250. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2019.0250
  16. Oertel, W., Wichard, T., & Weissgerber, A. (2015). Transformation of Ulva mutabilis (Chlorophyta) by vector plasmids integrating into the genome. Journal of Phycology, 51(5), 963–979. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpy.12336
  17. Wang, X., Yao, J., Zhang, J., & Duan, D. (2020a). Status of genetic studies and breeding of Saccharina japonica in China. Journal of Oceanology and Limnology, 38(4), 1064–1079. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00343-020-0070-1
Last updated: September 19, 2022 Back