Introduction

We consider Synthesis as the primary production or creation of material components. In this roadmap, the focus is on the generation of material components via engineered biology. This includes utilizing or exploiting engineered biology to produce monomers, polymers, biomolecules, and macromolecules that serve as components of a material (bulk or otherwise). Key challenges in Synthesis include high-yield production of protein-based natural materials, such as spider silk and elastin, from engineered biology; alternative biological production systems and utilization of natural and non-natural nucleic and amino acids; and enabling re-synthesis or recycling of materials to enable greater sustainability.

Engineering biology has the capability to transform the materials generated through biosynthesis and the catalysts which facilitate their formation. In this depiction, novel monomers with orthogonal reactivity enable sequence-defined polymerization and the precise control of monomer order provides programmed higher order structure. Equally important, this synthesis is carried out by robustly engineered enzymes able to recognize non-natural monomers.

Breakthrough Capabilities

Biological synthesis and/or polymerization of non-natural and/or abiotic chemical monomers, excluding amino acids.1Arranz-Gibert, P., Vanderschuren, K., & Isaacs, F.J. (2018). Next-generation genetic code expansion. Current Opinion in Chemical Biology, 46, 203-211. View Publication, 2Lutz, J-F., Ouchi, M., Liu, D.R., & Sawamoto, M. (2013). Sequence-controlled polymers. Science, 341(6146), e1238149. View Publication, 3Thuronyi, B.W., Privalsky T.M., & Chang, M.C.Y. (2017). Engineered fluorine metabolism and fluoropolymer production in living cells. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 56(44), 13637-13640. View Publication

Hybrid chemical and biological synthesis methods.8Johnston, T.G., Yuan, S., Wagner, J.M., Johnston, T.G., Yuan, S., Wagner, J.M., Yi, X., Saha, A., Smith, P., Nelson, A., & Alper, H.S. (2020). Compartmentalized microbes and co-cultures in hydrogels for on-demand bioproduction and preservation. Nature Communications, 11, 563. View Publication, 9Amiram, M., Haimovich, A.D., Fan, C., Wang, Y., Aerni, H., Ntai, I., Moonan, D.W., Ma, N.J., Rovner, A.J., Hong, S.H., Kelleher, N.L., Goodman, A.L., Jewett, M.C., Söll, D., Rinehart, J., & Isaacs, F.J. (2015). Evolution of translation machinery in recoded bacteria enables multi-site incorporation of nonstandard amino acids. Nature Biotechnology, 33, 1272–1279. View Publication

Engineering Biology (2019) Breakthrough Capabilities

Included in the roadmap are select breakthrough capabilities from our 2019 roadmap, Engineering Biology (below in green; milestones at 2021, 2024, 2029, and 2039). While these breakthrough capabilities were written in the context of advancing the field of engineering biology, the EBRC Materials Roadmapping Working Group leading this roadmapping project felt that the technical achievements elaborated in these breakthrough capabilities and their milestones directly contribute to achieving advancements in materials from engineering biology. This content has been incorporated as reference and, when pertinent, will be provided with context for its inclusion in this roadmap.

PCR, reverse transcription, cellular replication, and transcription of fully unnatural nucleotide-containing genes of up to 400 base pairs.

At this length, unnatural aptamer and aptazyme polymers could be regularly evolved and engineered.

Expanded genetic code systems for translation of >100-amino acid proteins containing fully-unnatural amino acids, and proteins with at least four, distinct unnatural amino acid building blocks.

Implementing unnatural amino acids for materials synthesis will require advancements in translation system engineering, to enable a broader production range from ribosomes. Furthermore, biosynthesis of sequence-defined synthetic biopolymers in which new chemistries (synthetic amino acids or synthetic monomers made-up of non-natural backbones) can be encoded in a template-directed manner, is likely to require the engineering or repurposing of organisms with multiple open coding channels (recoded genomes).

Ability to rationally engineer sensor suites, genetic circuits, metabolic pathways, signaling cascades, and cell differentiation pathways.

The engineering of circuits and pathways will be necessary for the synthesis of material components from engineered biology. The engineering of sensor suites and signalling cascades will also be important for the dynamic behaviors of materials, particularly living materials and composite materials that incorporate cells. More on engineering dynamic activities of materials can be found in Properties & Performance.

Ability to build and control small molecule biosynthesis inside cells by design or through evolution.

In the context of synthesizing materials from engineering biology, design and evolution of cells to build and control the synthesis of monomers, in addition to small molecules, will be important.

Ability to manufacture any targeted glycosylated protein or metabolite using cell-free biosynthesis.

Contributors to this roadmap have indicated that the 2024 milestone “Production of bacterial glycoconjugate vaccines in cell-free systems” would gain significant relevance and value by including the production of bacterial glycoconjugate therapeutic antibodies in cell-free systems, in addition to vaccines.

Production and secretion of any protein with the desired glycosylation or other post-translational modifications.17National Research Council (US) Committee on Assessing the Importance and Impact of Glycomics and Glycosciences. (2012). Transforming glycoscience: A roadmap for the future. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US). View publication.

In the context of synthesizing materials from engineering biology, this breakthrough capability can include the production and secretion of any small polypeptide, in addition to protein, with the desired modifications, and non-ribosomal protein production. Post-translational modifications that are likely to greatly contribute to protein and polypeptide synthesis for materials include phosphorylation, acetylation, and methylation, among other less-common modifications.

Long-lasting, robust, and low-cost cell-free system for protein synthesis and biomanufacturing.

Footnotes

  1. Arranz-Gibert, P., Vanderschuren, K., & Isaacs, F.J. (2018). Next-generation genetic code expansion. Current Opinion in Chemical Biology, 46, 203-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpa.2018.07.020
  2. Lutz, J-F., Ouchi, M., Liu, D.R., & Sawamoto, M. (2013). Sequence-controlled polymers. Science, 341(6146), e1238149. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1238149
  3. Thuronyi, B.W., Privalsky T.M., & Chang, M.C.Y. (2017). Engineered fluorine metabolism and fluoropolymer production in living cells. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 56(44), 13637-13640. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201706696
  4. Panganiban, B., Qiao, B., Jiang, T., DelRe, C., Obadia, M.M., Nguyen, T.D., Smith, A.A.A., Hall, A., Sit, I., Crosby, M.G., Dennis, P.B., Drockenmuller, E., Olvera de la Cruz, M., & Xu, Ting. (2018). Random heteropolymers preserve protein function in foreign environments. Science, 359(6381), 1239-1243. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aao0335
  5. Ribosome pilot challenge. Eterna. https://eternagame.org/labs/9162726 (Accessed January 6, 2021.)
  6. Hammerling, M.J., Fritz, B.R., Yoesep, D.J., Kim, D.S., Carlson, E.D., & Jewett, M.C. (2020). In vitro ribosome synthesis and evolution through ribosome display. Nature Communications, 11(1108). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-14705-2
  7. Lajoie, M.J., Rovner, A.J., Goodman, D.B., Aerni, H.R., Haimovich, A.D., Kuznetsov, G., Mercer, J.A., Wang, H.H., Carr, P.A., Mosberg, J.A., Rohland, N., Schultz, P.G., Jacobson, J.M., Rinehart, J., Church, G.M., & Isaacs, F.J. (2013). Genomically recoded organisms expand biological functions. Science, 342(6156), 357-360. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1241459
  8. Johnston, T.G., Yuan, S., Wagner, J.M., Johnston, T.G., Yuan, S., Wagner, J.M., Yi, X., Saha, A., Smith, P., Nelson, A., & Alper, H.S. (2020). Compartmentalized microbes and co-cultures in hydrogels for on-demand bioproduction and preservation. Nature Communications, 11, 563. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-14371-4
  9. Amiram, M., Haimovich, A.D., Fan, C., Wang, Y., Aerni, H., Ntai, I., Moonan, D.W., Ma, N.J., Rovner, A.J., Hong, S.H., Kelleher, N.L., Goodman, A.L., Jewett, M.C., Söll, D., Rinehart, J., & Isaacs, F.J. (2015). Evolution of translation machinery in recoded bacteria enables multi-site incorporation of nonstandard amino acids. Nature Biotechnology, 33, 1272–1279. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3372
  10. Vermaas, J.V., Dellon, L.D., Broadbelt, L.J., Beckham, G.T., & Crowley, M.F. (2019). Automated transformation of lignin topologies into atomic structures with LigninBuilder. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, 7(3), 3443–3453. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b05665
  11. Hadadi, N. & Hatzimanikatis, V. (2015). Design of computational retrobiosynthesis tools for the design of de novo synthetic pathways. Current Opinion in Chemical Biology, 28, 99-104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpa.2015.06.025
  12. Caspi, R., Billington, R., Fulcher, C. A., Keseler, I. M., Kothari, A., Krummenacker, M., … Karp, P. D. (2018). The MetaCyc database of metabolic pathways and enzymes. Nucleic Acids Research, 46(D1), D633–D639. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkx935 MetaCyc is available at https://metacyc.org.
  13. Jeske, L., Placzek, S., Schomburg, I., Chang, A., & Schomburg, D. (2019). BRENDA in 2019: a European ELIXIR core data resource. Nucleic Acids Research, 47(D1), D542–D549. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gky1048 BRENDA is available at https://www.brenda-enzymes.org/.
  14. Clark, D. S., & Blanch, H. W. (1997). Biochemical Engineering (Chemical Industries) (2nd ed., p. 716). New York, New York: Crc Press.
  15. Venayak, N., von Kamp, A., Klamt, S., & Mahadevan, R. (2018). MoVE identifies metabolic valves to switch between phenotypic states. Nature Communications, 9(1), 5332. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-07719-4
  16. Weinhandl, K., Winkler, M., Glieder, A., & Camattari, A. (2014). Carbon source dependent promoters in yeasts. Microbial Cell Factories, 13, 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2859-13-5; Hsiao, V., Cheng, A., & Murray, R. M. (2016). Design and application of stationary phase combinatorial promoters (SEED 2016 Technical Report). Retrieved from http://www.cds.caltech.edu/~murray/preprints/hcm16-seed_s.pdf
  17. National Research Council (US) Committee on Assessing the Importance and Impact of Glycomics and Glycosciences. (2012). Transforming glycoscience: A roadmap for the future. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US). https://doi.org/10.17226/13446
  18. Sethuraman, N., & Stadheim, T. A. (2006). Challenges in therapeutic glycoprotein production. Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 17(4), 341–346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2006.06.010
Last updated: January 19, 2021